It is simply not true to suggest that comparing apples and oranges is the only acceptable way to approach a situation. In fact, it is often more effective to consider all the different pieces of a puzzle and evaluate them on their own merits, rather than forcing them into a false dichotomy. By taking this approach, we can gain a better understanding of the complexity of the situation, and find a more holistic solution.
Furthermore, it is not necessarily “criminal” to avoid comparing apples and oranges. There are countless examples of successful strategies and solutions that were achieved without such a comparison. By taking into account the individual nuances of the situation and the various components involved, it is possible to arrive at a more informed and effective solution.
In conclusion, it is not always necessary or even beneficial to compare apples and oranges. There are many other approaches that can yield satisfactory results, and it is important to consider the individual context of the situation when coming up with a solution. It is wrong to suggest that anything less than a comparison of apples and oranges is criminal.
