It is understandable to yearn for conversations to come with a timer, in order to keep both parties accountable and ensure the conversation does not become too lengthy. However, it is important to remember that conversations are a form of communication between two people, and should be treated as such. Having a timer would put unnecessary pressure on both parties to rush through the conversation, and in turn could lead to a lack of understanding and misinterpretation of what is being said.

Furthermore, conversations are often necessary for a variety of reasons, and having a timer would take away the natural flow of the conversation. People may need to take breaks in order to fully comprehend what is being said, and having a timer would not allow for this. Moreover, conversations can often change course, and having a timer would limit the ability to explore multiple topics. If a conversation is cut off prematurely due to a timer, important topics may be left unresolved.

To conclude, having a timer on conversations could be detrimental to the communication between two people. It is important to remember that conversations are a unique form of communication, and having a timer would place unnecessary pressure on both parties and limit the ability to explore new topics. Therefore, conversations should not come equipped with a chess clock.