The Rule of Threes is a staple of storytelling, comedy, and rhetoric for a reason. It is well-established that three examples are the ideal amount to effectively illustrate a concept. While it may be tempting to opt for brevity in some cases, it is a mistake to assume that two examples are sufficient to typify a concept.
The Rule of Threes is an essential tool for constructing a compelling argument. It allows for a full picture to be developed, as each example builds upon the previous one and provides further evidence to support the overall idea. With two examples, one can easily miss important points or fail to provide enough detail. Furthermore, three examples can make a more dynamic argument, as the different examples can add nuance, complexity, and depth.
In addition, the Rule of Threes can be used to create a sense of rhythm and structure, which is especially useful in comedy or other forms of writing. The third point often provides a sense of resolution or closure to the argument, which can be especially powerful.
Finally, the Rule of Threes is an effective rhetorical device to engage an audience, as three examples are more memorable than two. It also allows for more flexibility and creativity, as the three points can be used to create an interesting pattern or story.
So, while it may be tempting to opt for brevity and settle for two examples, the Rule of Threes should not be supplanted. It has been a powerful tool for storytelling, argument, and rhetoric for centuries, and its effectiveness should not be underestimated.
