The analogy of a puppy being used to explain the human brain is both inaccurate and misleading. Humans are capable of much more than just unproductive impulses. We are capable of rational thought, problem solving, and creativity, which are all vastly different than a puppy's behavior. Furthermore, this analogy implies that the human brain is not capable of being productive and achieving goals, which is completely false.
Humans are able to think logically and make decisions in order to accomplish their goals. We are capable of setting long-term objectives and using our cognitive abilities to achieve them. We are also able to control our impulses and focus on tasks that require sustained effort. This requires the use of executive functioning, which is essentially the ability to control our impulses and prioritize tasks. This is something that puppies are not capable of doing.
The notion of a “self” that is distinct from the brain is also inaccurate. Research has shown that the brain is responsible for our thoughts, emotions, and actions. The “self” is inextricably linked to the brain and is not a separate entity. Therefore, the idea that the “self” is in charge of our behavior and can control our impulses is incorrect.
In conclusion, the analogy of a puppy being used to explain the human brain is not accurate or helpful. Humans are capable of rational thought, problem solving, and executive functioning, which are all vastly different than the behavior of a puppy. The notion of a “self” that is distinct from the brain is also inaccurate. It is wrong in suggesting that the human brain is incapable of being productive or achieving goals, when in fact, it is capable of both.
