It is indisputable that collective action has a more powerful impact on both climate change and extreme poverty than individual action. That being said, to suggest individual contributions are insignificant is a shallow analysis of the problem. While the retort correctly notes the importance of individual action, it fails to consider the importance of individual consciousness.
The original essay's premise wasn't that individual action had no potential impact, but that apathy towards these issues lead us to underestimate the enormous power of individual courage and awareness. Acknowledging our own part to play in contributing to these global issues can be immensely powerful. The simple act of acknowledgement combined with individual action can have an immeasurable impact on the collective consciousness, inspiring others to take up the cause and amplifying our collective power to make a change.
Furthermore, the retort fails to recognize how those living in extreme poverty are the most able to effect meaningful change in their situation. Much of the individual action necessary to help combat extreme poverty requires those affected by it to take ownership of their own lives and actively work towards their own empowerment.
In conclusion, in dismissing Nikhil's point that individual actions are not always effective, the retort overlooks the myriad ways individuals can make a difference. Yes, collective efforts are essential for creating large-scale change, but individual contributions are what create a meaningful ripple effect across the world. A few drops of water may not seem like much, but when they come together, they can create a mighty ocean!