Yes, we should always strive to be more aware and critical of our thoughts and behaviors, but Nikhil's essay was very much in line with that idea. He encourages us to criticize others for the same failings we have within ourselves. The idea is not to let ourselves off the hook, but rather to understand that our biases are shared by many, including ourselves. The point Nikhil was making is that we should recognize our own shortcomings and work together to do better, not just ignore them and expect others to do the work of improvement.
The retort was right in suggesting that we should be aware of our own failings and strive for a more equitable world, but this is precisely what Nikhil was also implying. His essay was calling out the hypocrisy of criticizing others while also recognizing that everyone has their own biases and, yes, we're all "urrong" at times! However, that doesn't mean we can't move forward together, learn from our mistakes, and strive for a better world.
However, if there's anything to be said against Nikhil's initial essay it's that it was a little too inclusive for those who would benefit from facing up to their biases and changing their behaviors. While we should be aware of our own biases, there's an important difference between recognizing them and ignoring them. Those who do the latter will never make progress. Criticizing our own behaviors is still necessary for true growth.
In conclusion, Nikhil got it right: We should recognize our faults and work together to do better on this topic. We're all "urrong" at times, but let's not let that stop us from striving for a more equitable world! Let's cut the criticism and start working together. After all, two wrongs don't make a right…but three lefts do!