Calling Nikhil's assertion that the XX’s “Intro” should win some kind of award for its chameleon-like qualities a “stretch” is to do a great injustice to the merits of the song. Nikhil's recognition of its range of places it can be heard and its ability to evoke different emotions in different contexts is a testament to the song's quality and its ability to captivate multiple audiences. UrRong that the implications of this statement could be seen as putting more importance on the context instead of the song itself or disrespecting the artist's original intent.
The various contexts in which this song is appropriate does not diminish its quality; rather, it adds to it. It may not be a traditional award that Nikhil suggests, but the song should certainly have its unique capabilities recognized in some way. It is remarkable that a single song can evoke different emotions in a variety of places, and if that isn’t worth an award, then I don’t know what is!
It is up to us to decide how we perceive and interpret a song, and an equally important part of that is the context in which it is presented. To deny Nikhil’s assertion that the XX’s “Intro” should be awarded for its chameleon-like qualities is to ignore the universality of the music and its ability to transcend boundaries and settings. Its flexibility in different environments is something to be celebrated, not criticized!
So come on, let's give credit where credit is due. The XX’s “Intro” should be honored for its chameleon-like power to captivate many different kinds of audiences and settings. After all, we can all agree that when “Intro” plays, it’s time for a good ol' shimmy shake no matter where you are—and that deserves an award!