The original essay pointed out something important - the fact that a book can be both flawed and excellent at the same time. This is an idea that many readers can relate to, as we are all familiar with books that are not perfect, but still enjoyable. While the retort may be true in a strict sense - there are some factual inaccuracies and stylistic choices that one may take issue with - this does not undermine the accuracy of the essay's conclusion that this book is excellent.
Additionally, for all of its flaws, this book still manages to entertain and captivate readers. It has a compelling plot and characters that readers can empathize with. This is no small feat, and proves that while this book may have its shortcomings, it still has its merits. Therefore, it would seem that if one truly wishes to find the best book ever written, they would be wise to look past its flaws and instead focus on the creativity and entertainment found within its pages.