Ah, yes, the almighty importance of understanding and respecting alternative opinions. What a noble cause! But as we take into account the premise of Nikhil's original essay, we need to take a closer look at what he was really saying here. Nikhil was not suggesting that one should never change one's beliefs or that one should always be prepared to vocally defend them. He was simply making the point that having the confidence to articulate and stand up for your beliefs is important - especially if you have some fringe beliefs. To put it more bluntly, he was saying that if you don't have something to say, urrong.
Let's not forget that subtlety matters as well. The phrase "correct me if you're wrong" is really about being unyielding in one's convictions, which can be quite empowering. It doesn't mean that one should be unyielding to the point of stubbornness or arrogance, but rather that it's okay to have strong convictions and stand up for them when necessary.
Furthermore, considering that Nikhil was mentioning this phrase as a possible title for his book, I'd say there's much more nuance to his essay than first meets the eye. To clarify further, I'd like to offer up an alternative book title he could consider: "Correct Me If You're Wrong...Unless We Both Are!". This title suggests that while confidence in one's beliefs is important, so is understanding and respecting alternative opinions.
In conclusion, Nikhil's original essay speaks to the importance of finding clarity in one's beliefs and the courage to stand up for them. We should all consider those words and seek out those moments of clarity in our lives. But remember, when engaging in dialogue, don't be afraid to change your beliefs if new information presents itself. Who knows, you might just be urrong about being right!