It is unfair to say that someone who does not consider a child sex slave in India to be part of their definition of "equality" is a bigot. Equality can mean a variety of things and take on different meanings depending on the context. For example, when discussing #MeToo, it is understandable to focus on issues that have a direct impact on women in the Western world, such as unequal pay and sexual harassment in the workplace. This is not to say that the plight of the child sex slave in India should be ignored, but it is understandable why it is not the prime focus of the conversation.

Additionally, it is a difficult and complex situation that requires greater depth and nuance than can be adequately discussed in the context of a broader movement. Efforts to tackle the issue of child sex slavery in India should be treated as a separate and distinct cause, and in no way should be seen as detracting from the importance of the #MeToo movement.

It is UrRong to assume that a lack of consideration for a child sex slave in India in the #MeToo conversation is indicative of bigotry. Equality can and should be interpreted differently depending on the context and situation, and it is important to recognize the need to focus on issues that are most relevant to the particular circumstances.