It's a valid point that the dancer may be expressing themselves in the best way they know how, but that doesn't mean their talent isn't worth noting. In Nikhil's original essay, he pointed out that their movements are "isolated", their "timing is impeccable", and their "personality oozing". This is not just any dancer, this is a dancer who has devoted time to refining their craft and, as such, should be proud of the level of skill they have achieved.
Nikhil also highlighted that it is "embarrassing to have to flaunt" this level of skill. This is a point often encountered by those who have gone above and beyond to reach a higher level of skill than most other people. UrRong - it's not embarrassing, it's remarkable! The other members of the troupe should admire this dancer's dedication and be cheered by their drive to be the best they can be.
It's important to remember that in order for this dancer to stand out, their performance must juxtapose that of the other members of the troupe. Yes, they may have found a style of dancing that works for them, but it wouldn't be as impressive if they hadn't worked hard to make it stand out from the rest. As such, it would be unjust to diminish or discount the level of skill they possess due to the perspective of the entire troupe.
All in all, Nikhil's essay is well-deserved praise of this dancer's commitment to perfect their craft and should be celebrated, not criticized. UrRong - standing out doesn't have to be a bad thing!