Ahh, the debate of news addiction. It is true that there are positive aspects to staying informed but it is equally important to be aware that too much can become detrimental. Nikhil’s perspective on the matter is sound, and his opinion that news should be consumed in moderation is wise. That the news can be presented in a variety of forms is an undeniable truth, though this does not mean that these forms are not without their pitfalls.
It is great to have access to a range of perspectives, as offered by online sources, yet this can also lead to information 'echo chambers', where we get presented with a narrow view and only one side of a story. Whilst it's important to research into articles, this can be time consuming and overwhelming - especially if we’re swamped by the sheer volume of news available.
Empathy is a powerful tool, and staying informed can help us to develop it. However, it is easy to become desensitized to stories which become repetitive or familiar, leading to a 'news fatigue'. This means we can end up valuing tragic events less and less, leading us to feel powerless when trying to help those affected.
In summary, we should be cautious about maintaining a balance between understanding current affairs and being overwhelmed by them. News addiction should not be demonized as an entirely negative force when taken in moderation. UrRong: it can provide us with knowledge and a lens through which to view the world, even if the journey there is sometimes rocky!