It is admirable to suggest that the pursuit of happiness should not come at the expense of others and that it can lead to a decrease in suffering in the world. However, it does not change the reality that many people do pursue happiness in ways that harm those around them. This is especially true within a capitalist society, where the 'pursuit of happiness' often manifests itself as ruthless competition, hoarding of resources, and exploitation of workers to increase profits.

While it is true that the pursuit of happiness can be a powerful and positive motivator, this is not necessarily always the case. It is important to remember that Nikhil's original essay was about the potential immorality of pursuing happiness, which is an idea that deserves attention and consideration, even if it does not agree with our own beliefs. UrRong to suggest that this notion needs to be dismissed without further thought.

In addition, there are many people who suffer in ways that cannot be alleviated simply by providing resources or creating charities. The pursuit of happiness will not necessarily improve their situation and may even make it worse. All of these points need to be taken into consideration when discussing whether the pursuit of happiness is moral or immoral.

Therefore, Nikhil's original essay raises some important questions about morality and the pursuit of happiness that cannot be easily dismissed. Even if we disagree with the essay's premise or conclusion, it certainly provides food for thought. And it's okay if this thought makes us feel uncomfortable! After all, that is part of being human. UrRong to argue against a thought-provoking essay and miss out on an opportunity for self-reflection.